SNAP is the entrance test for admission to all the institutes under Symbiosis Group for their Professional PG programs. There are 14 institutes accepting SNAP scores. The number of seats in each institute varies between 120 to 250.The best institutes are SIBM (Pune), SCMHRD (Pune) and SIIB (Pune). SNAP 2009 was not much different in many respects from previous year papers. The change in pattern from 2008 is given below
The total number of questions increased from 135 to 150.
The 2 marks questions were only in Analytical Reasoning/Logical Reasoning section unlike last year where the first 5 questions in each section had 2 marks while the rest of the questions had 1 mark. The negative marking remained constant at 25% of the maximum marks which was the same as last year. The total time remained at 120 minutes.
The broad section-wise breakup is given below.
|
SECTION |
No. of questions |
Marks per question |
Total |
|
General English) |
40 |
1 |
40 |
|
Quant, DI and DS |
40 |
1 |
40 |
|
General Awareness |
40 |
1 |
40 |
|
Analytical and Logical Reasoning |
30 |
2 |
60 |
|
TOTAL |
150 |
150 |
180 |
The breakup is given below
|
Area |
Topic |
Number of questions |
Total number of questions |
|
Reading Comprehension |
Passage on Child Emotions |
3 |
3 |
|
Verbal Ability |
Fill in the Blanks |
5 |
37 |
|
Grammar |
6 |
||
|
Analogies |
4 |
||
|
Parts of speech |
4 |
||
|
General Usage |
3 |
||
|
Vocabulary |
5 |
||
|
Idioms and Phrases |
2 + 2 = 4 |
|
|
Parajumbles |
1 |
|
|
Spellings and Punctuation |
5 |
||
|
Total |
|
40 |
40 |
The difficulty level of this section ranged from easy to moderate. There were lots of Grammar questions which were asked. The grammar questions would have taken some time to answer because the errors were difficult to spot. Those preparing for CAT would have done these questions easily. The questions on Fill in the blanks, Spellings and Punctuation and General Usage were very easy. A good time allocation strategy for this section would be around 30-35 minutes. Attempts in the range of 26-28 can be termed as good.
The breakup of the number of questions according to topics is as given below
|
Area |
Topic |
Number of questions |
Total number of questions |
|
Arithmetic |
Ratio and Proportion |
1 |
14 |
|
Percentage |
6 |
||
|
Number system |
2 |
||
|
Allegation |
1 |
||
|
Work |
2 |
||
|
SI/CI |
1 |
||
|
Time, Speed and Distance |
1 |
||
|
Algebra |
Algebraic Equation |
3 |
11 |
|
Inequality |
1 |
||
|
P&C |
3 |
||
|
Set theory & Probability |
1 + 2 = 3 |
||
|
Progressions |
1 |
||
|
Geometry and Mensuration |
Mensuration |
2 |
2 |
|
Geometry |
0 |
||
|
Miscellaneous |
Visual reasoning |
1 |
1 |
|
Data Interpretation |
Tables |
3 |
10 |
|
Pie Chart |
4 |
||
|
Table + Venn diagram |
3 |
||
|
Statistics |
Standard Deviation |
1 |
2 |
|
Mean and Variance |
1 |
||
|
TOTAL |
|
40 |
40 |
This section was of moderate difficulty level. Almost all the questions in this section were solvable in comparatively less time and were direct questions based on concepts and requiring hardly any application. There were two questions which did not have the correct options. The questions on Arithmetic were very easy, while the questions on Algebra were of medium difficulty level. The questions on Statistics were easy with straight forward application of Formulae. The sets on Tables and the Combined Chart should have been attempted. The question on Visual Reasoning should be left. In all, a good time allocation for this section should have been 35 minutes and one could attempt around 28-30 questions with a possible score of 25+.
There was a mix of questions on Definitions, Economy, Acronyms, History, Sport, Science & Technology and Current Affairs. The current affairs and business terms were given more weightage. The section looked easy at first glance, but on careful analysis the options were close. Hence those reading the current affairs regularly should have an edge. In general, a good time allocation for this section should have been 15 minutes and one could attempt around 24-26 questions with a possible score of 19+.
The breakup of the number of questions according to topics is as given below
|
Area |
Topic |
Number of questions |
Total number of questions |
|
Mathematical Reasoning |
Calendar |
1 |
13 |
|
Series(Number and letter) |
2 + 2 = 4 |
||
|
Flow Chart |
3 |
||
|
Bar graph |
2 |
||
|
Pie chart |
2 |
||
|
Miscellaneous |
1 |
||
|
Logical Reasoning |
Arrangement(2 sets) |
4 + 2 = 6 |
9 |
|
Coding |
1 |
||
|
Non Verbal |
1 |
||
|
Miscellaneous |
1 |
||
|
Critical Reasoning |
Verbal analogies |
4 |
8 |
|
Critical Inferences |
4 |
||
|
TOTAL |
|
30 |
30 |
The section had the highest weightage in terms of marks. DI was a part of this section too and again the questions were not calculation-intensive but required basic understanding and some logic. Some of the questions were easily doable with the help of options and required very less time to solve. Questions based on critical reasoning were time-consuming. Visual Reasoning questions were easy. There were 2 questions on groups and conditionality, which again were very easy. There were 5 single-question sets on Strong/Weak Arguments, which were slightly on the tougher side requiring some analysis compared to the rest of the section.
A good strategy for any student would have been to spend a good amount of time in this section on account of the higher marks per question which implies a higher return for time spent. Overall, a good time allocation for this section should have been 45 minutes and one could attempt around 22-25 questions with a possible score of 40+
An analysis of all the sections with the number of doable questions is given below for ready reference
|
Finer Details of SNAP 2009 |
||||||
|
Topics |
Total Questions |
Difficulty Level |
Time Allocation (minutes) |
Doable questions |
Maximum wrong questions acceptable |
Possible score |
|
General English |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal ability |
37 |
Easy to Moderate |
25 |
28 |
2 |
25.5 |
|
Reading Comprehension |
3 |
Moderate |
5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
TOTAL |
40 |
|
30 |
29 |
2 |
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QA, DI and DS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arithmetic |
14 |
Easy to Moderate |
12 |
8 |
2 |
5.5 |
|
Algebra |
11 |
Easy to Moderate |
12 |
8 |
2 |
5.5 |
|
Geometry and Mensuration |
2 |
Easy to Moderate |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Higher Math |
2 |
Easy |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
Data Interpretation |
10 |
Easy to Moderate |
8 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
|
Miscellaneous |
1 |
Difficult |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
40 |
|
35 |
27 |
4 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Awareness |
40 |
Moderate to Difficult |
15 |
25 |
4 |
20 |
|
TOTAL |
40 |
|
15 |
25 |
4 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytical and Logical Reasoning |
|
Easy |
|
|
|
|
|
Mathematical Reasoning |
13 |
Varying |
20 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
|
Logical Reasoning |
9 |
Moderate to Difficult |
15 |
7 |
1 |
11.5 |
|
Critical Reasoning |
8 |
Easy to Moderate |
10 |
6 |
1 |
9.5 |
|
TOTAL |
30 |
|
45 |
23 |
2 |
41 |
|
Grand Total |
150 |
|
120 |
104 |
12 |
109.5 |
The estimated cut-offs of 2009 for some of the leading institutes are as shown below.
|
Institute |
Estimated Cut-Off |
|
SIBM (Pune) |
108-114 |
|
SCM-HRD |
102-107 |
|
SIIB |
98-104 |
|
SITM |
88-96 |
|
SCIT |
82+ |
|
SIBM Bangalore |
92+ |
|
SIOM |
62+ |
|
SIMS |
62+ |
|
SICSR |
58+ |
|
SIMC |
|
|
SIG |
|
|
SIHS |
Disclaimer: The above cutoffs are only suggestive in nature and may differ from the actual cutoffs. Roots Education cannot be held responsible for any decision taken by the candidate on the basis of the above information.