Welcome to MBAGuru, a name which is now synonymous to 'Personalized Mentoring'. MBAGuru offers world-class comprehensive preparation services for entrance examinations of leading B-Schools in India and abroad. Formed by graduates from leading institutes in India (IIM-A, IIM-C, IIT Delhi) and abroad (The Wharton School), the institute has re-written the rules of coaching industry by continuously innovating and bringing state-of-the-art teaching methodologies within the reach of MBA aspirants.

Detailed Analysis And Strategy For JMET

BASIC STATISTICS

This exam  is usually  used  for doing  MBA  from various  IITs.  This exam  has  some  high  end questions  in Math  and that has been the USP  of  this  entrance. The number  of  seats in each of the IITs is given below, along with probable cut-offs of  the written scores of  last year. It usually gives  out ranks  for each  of  the  individual IITs based  on  the  scores  obtained  in the  written exam. One has to apply  separately  to different  IITs as they do not send calls for the personality assessment  round on their own.

IITs

Batch Strength of 2010

Rank for which GD/PI call is expected

Expected Cut-off Marks for 09

IIT  Mumbai

82

Till 300

67-69

IIT  Delhi

61

Till 500

64-66

IIT  Kharagpur

81

Till 800

61-63

IIT  Kanpur

53

Till 1000

56-60

IIT  Madras

63

Till 1200

53-55

IIT  Roorkee

63

Till 1400

50-52

The pattern of  JMET  in 2009  was  same  as  in the  previous  year i.e.  120 questions  and 180 minutes. Each correct answer carried 1 mark while each wrong answer  carried a penalty  of  0.25 marks. It must be highlighted  that as many as 10-12 questions  in the  entire  test paper had errors  with DI section taking the maximum share of  those  errors.  The section-wise breakup of questions for JMET-09 is presented below:

 

SECTION

No of questions

 

Marks per question

Quantitative aptitude

30

1

Verbal Communication

30

1

Logical Reasoning

30

1

Data Interpretation

30

1

TOTAL

120

 

The sectional analysis is given below.

 

VERBAL COMMUNICATION

The sectional  breakup  is given below.

 

Area

 

Topic

Number of questions

Total number of questions

Reading
Comprehension

Passage on Philosophical Evolution

3

14

Passage on Nuclear Peril

3

Passage on Evolutionary Relationships

3

Passage on Science

4

Verbal Ability

Analogies

3

16

Antonyms / Synonyms

2 + 2 = 4

Sentence Completion/Correction

1 + 4 = 5

Grammar

2

Spelling

1

Sentence with Contextual Meaning

1

TOTAL

 

30

30

The passages  were short but difficult to comprehend. Most  of  the questions  were direct  and could be solved  by the elimination of the choices. Out of the given  14 questions, one could have easily  attempted 10 questions  and got nearly  8-9 correct. From the other sections,  one could have got the vocabulary  based questions  correct.  The questions  on  Grammar,  which tested knowledge  on  Reported  speech  and  the  questions  on  sentence  correction  were easy.  The contextual  meaning  questions,  and the spelling  based questions  were  easy.  The number  of correct attempts  could  have  been   8-9  in  the  verbal  ability  sub-section.  The  total  correct attempts could have been 17-18 in a span of  40 mins, with a minimum net score of 16-17.

 

QUANTITATIVE ABILITY

The sectional  breakup  is given below.

Area

Topic

Number of questions

Total number of questions

Arithmetic

Ratio and Proportion

1

8

Percentage

1

Number system

1

Time, Speed and Distance

5

Algebra

Algebraic Equation

3

10

Graphs

1

P&C

4

Probability

1

Function

1

Geometry and Mensuration

Mensuration

5

7

Geometry

2

Higher Math

LPP

2

5

Higher Degree equation

1

Application of  Calculus

2

TOTAL

 

30

30

The topics ranged from simple percentage questions to linear programming, differential calculus and  probability.   The  questions   on  Calculus  were  easy.   The  other   topics   from  which  the questions  could have been attempted were respectively  3 from Geometry and Mensuration,  2 each from P&C  , Time and speed   and 1 each  from Graphs,  Higher degree  equation, Function, Number system,  Percentage  and  Ratio.  With a  little  more  common  sense   one  could  have attempted more questions  of  Arithmetic  and Geometry.  The total  number of  correct attempts could have been 17-19 in time span of 50 mins, with a minimum  net score of  15-16.

 

LOGICAL REASONING

The Data Matching  sets  and  the  Blood relation  sets were moderately  difficult while the  rest  of the questions  were of  easy to medium  level  of  difficulty. The questions  on deductive  reasoning were  from  Statement   Conclusion,   Logical   Deduction   and  If-Else  types.   The  questions   on Inductive  Reasoning  were from Strong and Weak arguments,  Assumptions  and Conclusions and Miscellaneous  single  liners.  There  were some easy  questions,  including the  one  on  Coding- Decoding,   Statements  &   Conclusions  and   Jumbled   Paragraphs  which  should   have  been attempted. A good attempt would have been 21 questions  in the time  limit of  45 minutes  with a possible score of  16+.

The sectional  breakup  is given below

Area

Topic

Number of questions

Total number of questions

Critical Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

7

17

Inductive Reasoning

7

Jumbled Paragraphs

3

Analytical Reasoning

Coding/Decoding

1

12

Decision Making

1

Data Matching

5

Blood relation

5

Mathematical Reasoning

Based on Geometry

1

1

TOTAL

 

30

30

 

DATA INTERPRETATION

The sectional  breakup  is given below.

Topic

Total number of questions

Table

8(2 sets of 4 each)

Pie-chart

5

Bar Graph

5

Scattered Graph

3

Combination of Bar and Line Graph

4

Line Graph

5

TOTAL

30

The Data Interpretation  questions  were for the most part quite  straightforward  and could have been solved  by simple  observation.  One of  the sets  had all wrong answers.  The sets  on tables, bar graph  and line graph  should  have been attempted. A good attempt would have been  22-24 questions in the time limit of 45 minutes with a possible score of  20+.

 

OVERALL ANALYSIS

An analysis  of  all the  sections  with the  number  of  doable  questions  is given  below for ready reference.

Finer Details of JMET 2009

Topics

Total Questions

Difficulty Level

Time Allocation (minutes)

Doable questions

Maximum wrong questions acceptable

Possible score

Verbal Communication

 

 

 

 

 

 

Verbal ability

16

Easy to Moderate

20

10

2

7.5

Reading Comprehension

14

Moderate to difficult

20

10

1

8.75

TOTAL

30

 

40

20

3

16.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quantitative Ability

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arithmetic

8

Moderate

15

6

1

4.75

Algebra

10

Difficult

20

6

1

4.75

Geometry and Mensuration

7

Moderate to Difficult

10

4

1

2.75

Higher Math

5

Moderate to Difficult

5

2

0

2

TOTAL

30

 

50

18

3

14.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Logical Reasoning

 

 

 

 

 

 

Critical Reasoning

17

Moderate

23

12

2

9.5

Analytical Reasoning

 

12

Moderate to Difficult

20

8

2

5.5

Mathematical Reasoning

1

Easy

2

1

0

1

TOTAL

30

 

45

21

4

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data Interpretation

30

Easy to Moderate

45

23

2

20.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRAND TOTAL

120

 

180

82

12

67

 

STRATEGY FOR JMET 2010

Since the  cut-offs  have  been  around  65-70%  of the  maximum marks  for  good institutes (IIT-B,  D  and K),  the attempts have to be maximised in order to be on the safe  side.  The suggested  strategy  could be to allocate 40 mins in each of the  4 sections  followed by a 20 min time allocation to  your strong  section  in order  to maximize your score.

 

Disclaimer: The above  cutoffs are  suggestive  in nature and may differ from actual  cutoffs. Roots education  Pvt. Ltd.  cannot be held  responsible  for any decision taken by the candidate  on the basis of the above information.



Home | About Us | Careers | Contact Us | ©2003-2011 Roots Education Private Limited